You can use divisibility rules to find the small prime factors.
The number ends in 5, so is divisible by 5.
795/5 = 159
The sum of digits is 1+5+9 = 15; 1+5 = 6, a number divisible by 3, so 3 is a factor.
159/3 = 53 . . . . . a prime number,* so we're done.
795 = 3×5×53
* If this were not prime, it would be divisible by a prime less than its square root. √53 ≈ 7.3. We know it is not divisible by 2, 3, or 5. We also know the closest multiples of 7 are 49 and 56, so it is not divisible by 7. Hence 53 is prime.
Aye bruh i don’t know this but someone else who smarter than us will answer this
Step-by-step explanation:
Prime factorization requires dividing by primes starting with smallest prime number
402/2=201
201/3=67, 67 is prime so we cannot go further so the prime factorization of 402 is
2X3X67
A-3, B- 1, C- 2, D- 4, E- 5
Step-by-step explanation:
A. a whole number greater than one that has exactly two positive factors: one and itself
3. prime number
B. a whole number greater than one that has more than two positive factors
1. composite number
C. a prime number that divides evenly into a given number
2. prime factor
D. the largest number that divides evenly into two or more given numbers
4. greatest common factor
E. a number that divides evenly into a given number
5. factor
I hope this helps you
[tex]1.what is the prime factorization of the radicand in 4 square root of 2520 2. show all work for cred[/tex]
3×5×53
Step-by-step explanation:
You can use divisibility rules to find the small prime factors.
The number ends in 5, so is divisible by 5.
795/5 = 159
The sum of digits is 1+5+9 = 15; 1+5 = 6, a number divisible by 3, so 3 is a factor.
159/3 = 53 . . . . . a prime number,* so we're done.
795 = 3×5×53
* If this were not prime, it would be divisible by a prime less than its square root. √53 ≈ 7.3. We know it is not divisible by 2, 3, or 5. We also know the closest multiples of 7 are 49 and 56, so it is not divisible by 7. Hence 53 is prime.
d
c
b
d
c
Step-by-step explanation:
r(0,90)(x,y) . t(-5,0)
last option
step-by-step explanation:
∆def to ∆d"e"f"
- rotate 90 counterclockwise degrees
- then translated 5 to the left (x --> x - 5)
answer is the last option
[tex]Which rule describes the composition of transformations that map ∆def to ∆d"e"f"? (look at picture)<[/tex]