What was the effect of the supreme court case mcculloch v. maryland?
it local governments use direct democracy.
it denied states the right to control local governments.
it supported the strength of local governments over states.
it legitimized the power of the national government over states.
it showed how the national government’s power needs to be checked.
It legitimized the power of the national government over states.
Explanation:
The conflict of the McCulloch v. Maryland case originated when James W. McCulloch, a cashier of the Baltimore branch of the Second Bank of the United States, refused to pay a tax imposed by the state of Maryland to the bank.
When the case went to the Supreme Court, the state of Maryland argued that as a sovereign state, it had the power to tax any business within its borders, including a national bank. However, the court determined two things: first, it established that to charter a bank was one of the implied powers of the government enunciated in Section 8 of Article I (this governmental power had been on debate during the hearings), and second, it determined that even though the states retained the power of taxation, federal laws were supreme and could not be controlled by the states, and this way, the case legitimized the power of the national government over states.
D) It legitimized the power of the national government over states.
Explanation:
The McCullough vs. Maryland case dealt with the state of Maryland and their opportunity to tax the national bank located in Maryland. In this case, the Supreme Court ruled that Maryland cannot tax the national bank because of the supremacy clause of the US Constitution. This law states that federal laws are superior to state laws. This supremacy clause makes it so that a state law that violates a federal law is void.
I believe the answer is: "It legitimized the power of the national government over states
The case of McCulloch vs. Maryland revolve around the taxation fee that the state of Maryland gave to McCulloch by using the state power to tax any business within its borders.
McCulloch refuse that payment since he already paid his taxes to the Federal government, and the court ruled out that the national government has a supremacy over the states and protect McCulloch from paying his taxes twice.
The correct answer is: "It legitimized the power of the national government over states".
McCulloch v. Maryland was a US Supreme Court case that led to the enactment of a landmark decision in 1819. It defined the powers of the US Congress, branch of the US federal government, in relation to powers at the state level.
The decision acknowledged the "necessary and proper clause", included in the US Constitution and which gives to the federal goverment certain implied powers which are not explicitly listed in the US Constitution. Moreover, it states that the federal goverment is supreme over state powers, so that the ability of the latter to interfere on the decisions of the first is limited.
The correct answer is: "It declared the supremacy of the federal goverment over state goverments and the existence of implied powers, not explicitly listed in the Constitution but authorized by its content"
McCulloch v. Maryland was a case discussed by the US Supreme Court which led to the enactment of a landmark decision in 1819.
It delimited the scope of the different goverment levels existing in the US. More specifically, it declared the supremacy of the federal goverment over the states, whose power to interfere with the federal decisions is limited. Moreover, some of the federal powers are implied, which means that they are not explictly enumerated in the Constitution but authorized by its provisions.
In this case, the state of Maryland could not challenge the decision of creating a national bank that had been adopted at a federal level. The creation of a national bank was not listed as one of the powers of the federal goverment in the Constitution, therefore it is an implied power.
In McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) the Supreme Court ruled that Congress had implied powers under the Necessary and Proper Clause of Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution to create the Second Bank of the United States and that the state ofMaryland lacked the power to tax the Bank.
In McCulloch v. Maryland, SCOTUS determined that Congress did in fact have the power to charter a National Bank and that it was impermissible for Maryland to tax or interfere with instruments of the federal government engaged in permissible activities.
In short, it told the States to take a hike and know their place when it came to federal v. state powers.
its d. for plato users
C. It legitimized the power of the national government over states
Answer and explanation;
-The decision or judgement in McCulloch v. Maryland case was so important because the Supreme Court ruled that the federal government could pass laws not expressly written in the Constitution, which was a victory by the federal government over the states.
-The Supreme court struck down Maryland's attempts to place a tax on the second National Bank of the U.S. The court reasoned that the tax would essentially be a measure to undermine federal power and that the Constitution forbids any action by the states to do so.