The historian must be constantly and regularly looking for sources that enable his contact with historical events that have already taken place over time.
Historical events are opinions, thoughts, and social movements that have produced events and led to changes that have somehow impacted the life of a group or people.
To understand these events, the historian defines the aspects that he will study, the sources to be analyzed, the opinions he wishes to discuss and the feelings he deems most important.
The techniques, records, interviews, questions, data cataloging, among others, give security to carry out scientifically the work of the historian.
It should be remembered that no historical event is a 100% pure. The record of events always reflects, in one way or another, the opinion, thought and even the interests of the one who made notes about what he saw, lived or heard, but historians, when analyzing all the sources, must be as much objective as possible.
When analyzing a source, historian has to remain unbiased and free from personal feelings and opinions. They know that there are different source of an event and they may reveal different facts which could cross-check his argument. The objective historiography is possible only when the historian is unbiased and when different sources like archaeological, literary and other sources are cross-checked and interpreted independently.
When analyzing a source, historian has to remain unbiased and free from personal feelings and opinions. They know that there are different source of an event and they may reveal different facts which could cross-check his argument. The objective historiography is possible only when the historian is unbiased and when different sources like archaeological, literary and other sources are cross-checked and interpreted independently.
When historians analyze the source they use to write and develop a historical theme, event or process, they try to remain objective. This is not easy to achieve, since historically sources should be explored to judge to what extent this source is objective, when it was written, who wrote it, under what conditions and in what kind of environment. All this in order that the analysis and implementation of the given source in the work of the historians will be representative and accurate, in other words to avoid bias, ie they want to be unbiased by personal feelings and opinions.
When analyzing the a source, historians want to remain Certain, they don't want to be Influenced by their personal feelings and opinions. They know that different sources may reveal different Points of view.
The historian must be constantly and regularly looking for sources that enable his contact with historical events that have already taken place over time.
Historical events are opinions, thoughts, and social movements that have produced events and led to changes that have somehow impacted the life of a group or people.
To understand these events, the historian defines the aspects that he will study, the sources to be analyzed, the opinions he wishes to discuss and the feelings he deems most important.
The techniques, records, interviews, questions, data cataloging, among others, give security to carry out scientifically the work of the historian.
It should be remembered that no historical event is a 100% pure. The record of events always reflects, in one way or another, the opinion, thought and even the interests of the one who made notes about what he saw, lived or heard, but historians, when analyzing all the sources, must be as much objective as possible.
Historians want to remain objective and unbiased
1 Unbiased 2 influenced 3 facts.
Explanation:
Good luck.
When analyzing a source, historian has to remain unbiased and free from personal feelings and opinions. They know that there are different source of an event and they may reveal different facts which could cross-check his argument. The objective historiography is possible only when the historian is unbiased and when different sources like archaeological, literary and other sources are cross-checked and interpreted independently.
When analyzing a source, historian has to remain unbiased and free from personal feelings and opinions. They know that there are different source of an event and they may reveal different facts which could cross-check his argument. The objective historiography is possible only when the historian is unbiased and when different sources like archaeological, literary and other sources are cross-checked and interpreted independently.
.
.
.
hope it helps you...
MARK AS BRAINLIEST
When historians analyze the source they use to write and develop a historical theme, event or process, they try to remain objective. This is not easy to achieve, since historically sources should be explored to judge to what extent this source is objective, when it was written, who wrote it, under what conditions and in what kind of environment. All this in order that the analysis and implementation of the given source in the work of the historians will be representative and accurate, in other words to avoid bias, ie they want to be unbiased by personal feelings and opinions.
first blank is unbiased, second blank is influenced. third blank is facts.
Explanation:
i hoped this helped you. good luck<3
Certaininfluenced points of view
When analyzing the a source, historians want to remain Certain, they don't want to be Influenced by their personal feelings and opinions. They know that different sources may reveal different Points of view.